Qassia - the mother of all websites Qassia United States
Qassia Global > Qassia United States > danaroid86's Intel > Goverment Info
Intel Contributor
This intel was added by danaroid86

Intel Classification
This intel has been classified as Legally Redistributed Content, which means it was not authored by the contributor, but redistribution is legal.

Intel Calendar
November, 2008
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November

Sign Up!
Not a member yet? You're missing out on one of the most powerful website promotion resources on the web. Sign up and join the party.

About Qassia
Find out more about Qassia by reading our About Us page, if you haven't done so already. Or you could skip straight to the Sign Up form.

PRINT THIS INTEL EMAIL THIS INTEL

Goverment Info

US officials over the weekend announced that they had lost control of a US spy satellite and that it is expected to fall to Earth sometime next month. They have no idea where it will impact and unlike other reentries of space hardware -- this one can't be controlled since the vehicle is not responding.

According to a New York Times article, people who follow spy satellites think that the satellite they are referring to is an experimental imagery satellite built by Lockheed Martin and launched on a Delta II in December of 2006. The article also quotes Jonathan McDowell, creator of the Johnathon Space Report that independently tracks all space launches for his expert opinion. His comment? The orbit has already dropped to 275 km, an altitude that is impractical due to the heavy atmospheric drag.

This won't be the first time a satellite has fallen out of the sky. In 1978, a soviet nuclear powered spy satellite fell in northwest Canada (in a very sparsely populated region). Other satellites have fallen into the ocean (a high probability given how much of the Earth is covered in oceans).

Well, not 'fall out of the sky' exactly. It is more like slowly de-orbit. Each orbit the spacecraft, now with no ability to re boost itself when necessary slowly loses altitude (McDowell claims it dropped 15-20 km in the last few weeks). As the spacecraft gets lower it starts to hit more an more of the upper atmosphere which slows it down even more. A spacecraft like the Russian Progress vehicle, used to carry cargo to and remove garbage from the International Space Station, can be brought down so that it is sure to burn up in the atmosphere.

A satellite that we do not have control over would just de-orbit on its own and could potentially not burn up completely on reentry but rather leave bits of the spacecraft bus that can hit the Earth.

Larger structures like the US Skylab facility and the Russian Mir space station were too large to burn up completely on reentry, but the Russians were able to uses thrusters to de-orbit Mir in the largest expanse of ocean they could find, the South Pacific. Skylab teams however had to confront a completely uncontrolled de-orbit for Skylab, luckily the structure hit in a remote part of Australia.

Any bets on where this one will hit? Where ever it is, don't take home the pieces, hydrazine reaction control thruster fuel and batteries can be bad for your health...

US warns satellite will fall to Earth soon [LA Times]
US Spy Satellite, Power Gone, May Hit Earth [New York Times]

External Links

http://r.yuwie.com/dannyd86

Images

spy satellite
spy satellite

Copyright Notice: All Rights Reserved.

Add to Facebook Digg Add to Mixx Add to Reddit Add to StumbleUpon
Added by danaroid86 on February 3, 7:30 PM.

Rate This Intel

Please login or sign up to rate this intel.

Comments

Please login or sign up to add a comment.





Search 2.0 [10/30] - The Qassia search function has been massively overhauled. Wh...



ABOUT | FAQ | PRESS RELEASES | HELP | CONTACT
USAGE POLICY | PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 2008 Qassia. All Rights Reserved.

Username:
Password:
No account? Sign up.
Lost password? Retrieve.