Qassia Qassia United States
Qassia Global > Qassia United States > Jason Cangialosi's Intel > Wes Anderson's "The Darjeeling Limited"
Intel Contributor
This intel was added by Jason Cangialosi


Jason Cangialosi

Intel Classification
This intel has been classified as Existing Authored Content, which means it was authored by the contributor, and first appeared on the contributor's blog or website.

Intel Calendar
December, 2008
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031

January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November, December

Sign Up!
Not a member yet? You're missing out on one of the most powerful website promotion resources on the web. Sign up and join the party.

About Qassia
Find out more about Qassia by reading our About Us page, if you haven't done so already. Or you could skip straight to the Sign Up form.

PRINT THIS INTEL EMAIL THIS INTEL

Wes Anderson's "The Darjeeling Limited"

Review of Wes Anderson's, The Darjeeling Limited, Starring Owen Wilson, Adrien Brody and Jason Schwartzman

The Irrational Transcendentalism of a Perfect Circle:

Warning: This film has snakes on a train, but contrary to rumors is not a sequel to Snakes on a Plane and I will ruin this film for you with indulgent interpretation.

The sporadic rhapsody that is Wes Anderson's The Darjeeling Limited, begins with a time warped moment initiating what seems to be plot. Bill Murry ensues on a white rabbit dash to meet his train, but falls short as Adrien Brody outruns him with a sprawling hop onboard. The moment holds cinematic significance, but takes some serious plot derailment to reveal its meaning. That train is the Darjeeling Limited, an imaginary line that crosses India and is host to the spiritual journey of three brothers. The brothers: a triumvirate of tragic-comic minds including Owen Wilson, Adrien Brody and Jason Schwartzman.

Trains are always dependable for plot progress. Yet, in true Anderson fashion the story in motion gets derailed by characters that are too playful for the constraints of plot. Anderson's trademark symmetry of tones; both of color and sound, mystify our conscious awareness of this shift. We willing tumble along a plot that has gone off course into the psyche of enigmatic characters. This is definitely not a flaw of the director, but one used as symbolism in the manipulation of plot by impulsive characters.

In the case of The Darjeeling Limited this symbolism is the excessive baggage that three brothers carry on a train, one derailed on the track to spiritual sanctuary. Not to mention, after which, the symbolism of also trying to save three young Indian brothers drowning in a river. The "X" on their map of sanctuary is their M.I.A mother, a born again nun played by Anjelica Huston. In an emotional sense she is holding the missing closure they yearn for in their father's death; a catalyst of their family's splintering.

One boards this story knowing it will be powered by the dysfunctional, yet adored characters of Anderson's imagination. It also comes as collaboration with Jason Schwartzman's debut as a writer and cinematic progeny, Roman Coppola. Anderson, Schwartzman and Coppola actually traveled to India to absorb the sights, smells and tastes, as well as to scout locations. It's tempting to speculate how the three writers channeled this experience into the characters of three brothers.

Perhaps Owen Wilson's controlling ways, ruled by itinerary and dependent on assistants, is Anderson the director. Then there is the mysterious presence of Adrien Brody's character, whose motivations are as "behind the scenes" as Roman Coppola's diverse career in film. More obvious perhaps is Jason Schwartzman, who plays a writer that desires, but is not desperate for his brothers' approval. Or course this is pure speculation and only Barbara Walters's or James Lipton's prying ways could land this bait in hidden pools of inspiration.

The strongest element exuding from The Darjeeling Limited is the Bollywood-esque Mise-en-scène. One can almost smell the spices and feel the vhttp://www.qassia.com/mama.pl
Edit Intel - Qassiaivid colors of Indian cloth basking in the warm sun. The rhythm of the plot plays much like Indian Tabla drumming; deep patterns of repetition forming an illusion of melody. In the end, at risk of ruining the ending, the brothers do find a kind of closure, but it's more of an acceptance. The kind of aural acceptance you give Tabla drumming, in allowing its beautification of repetition to consume you. Once these three brothers allow the repetition of emotional inevitability, meaning some things never change, they are freed from their baggage.

As if to comment on the film's own use of obvious symbolism, Owen Wilson's character is captivated by something his assistant says. The train gets lost taking a wrong track and he says "We haven't located us yet." Wilson translates this synchronicity as a motto for their own spiritual journey; the brothers haven't located their true selves yet. It's like Vedic philosophy from an Indian fortune cookie; life's spiritual destination is in the journey itself.

Enter here, Bill Murry's father figure character; another Wes Anderson trademark. While the end credits imply Murry's character is simply "Business Man", past experience (Rushmore, Life Aquatic) assumes he is their father. The brothers' journey comes full circle back to the time warped moment of Adrien Brody and Bill Murry rushing to make the Darjeeling Limited. At the film's start we see Murry missing the train in his 1960s attire, as Brody surpasses him to board, baggage in hand. The Station and the Train are a timeless loop of existence, where a father's short comings are fulfilled by his sons. Thus when Brody, Wilson and Schwartzman almost miss the Darjeeling Limited in the end, they shed their baggage to make the train.

It may seem that the act of shedding emotional baggage was the key ingredient to the brothers' closure. Yet, that Brody's character made the train at the film's start and his brothers were already on it shows that the journey was already fulfilled. The only missing piece was in the awareness that time (trains) and space (the station) are sometimes irrelevant infinities (loops) and the essence is in the journey. The brothers are constantly trying to awaken themselves to this, even if in self-destructive ways. The life-affirming acts of tobacco smoke, Schwartzman's sex on a train and indulgent pain-killer doses. It's all about numbing the body to cleanse the mind of the desire to be numb; how's that for a paradox?

The Darjeeling Limited is not so much a paradox as it is the irrational transcendentalism of a perfect circle. In another fitting synchronicity as I sit and finish this review, taking the last sip from my Starbucks, I glance at the cup's "The Way I See It" message. It reads, "I used to think that going to the jungle made my life an adventure. However, after years of unusual work in exotic places, I realize that it is not how far off I go or how deep into the forest I walk that gives my life meaning. I see that living life fully is what makes life - anyone's life, no matter where they do or do not go -an adventure", (Maria Fadiman). There's that fortune cookie philosophy again, starring at me from a coffee cup label. Life is the journey, not the destination. The last montage of The Darjeeling Limited resonates here that we must embrace this or be imprisoned by our own compartmentalized sleeping cars on the tracks of life.

Besides the act of broadening your consciousness, prior to seeing The Darjeeling Limited it was recommended that audiences see the short film, Hotel Chevalier. The short was directed by Wes Anderson and starring Jason Schwartzman and Natalie Portman, without the intention of becoming a feature. Portman has a cameo in The Darjeeling Limited, but it holds little meaning without having seen Hotel Chevalier. The short film was available for free download on iTunes, but it is now being released theatrically with the feature. While the filmmakers assured audiences they must see the short to fully grasp the feature, the opposite seems truer, or is that just another paradox?


Contributor's Note

When the past meets future for Jason, the moment is fueled by a creative background in music, writing, film and philosophy providing a nexus of the complex world to come. He is currently a freelance writer and ghostwriter of books, articles and screenplays.

External Links

The Irrational Transcendentalism of a Perfect Circle | Hotel Chevalier Official Site

Copyright Notice: All Rights Reserved.

Add to Facebook Digg Add to Mixx Add to Reddit Add to StumbleUpon
Added by Jason Cangialosi on July 16, 8:38 AM.

Rate This Intel

Please login or sign up to rate this intel.

Comments

Please login or sign up to add a comment.

I saw this movie. Being less of an expert than the reviewer, I missed the irrational transcendentalism of a perfect circle, as well as the symbolism of Bill Murray being in '60's attire, plus a lot of other stuff, but I liked the movie nonetheless. Owen Wilson, as usual, superbly captures the hilarity of excessive ambition, and the film is devoid of odd moments apart from the peacock's feather routine. I thought it was a good and funny low-brow comedy and enjoyed it as such, but thanks to Jason Cangialosi for showing me that it was much more than that.

nick Jul 16, 2008 11:59
I don't know if I was distracted, or if I just didn't get this movie. Maybe it just isn't my kind of comedy. I watched it because it had Owen Wilson it. He is usually hilarious. However, I found it difficult to continue watching the movie. I struggled through the whole movie. It felt like I was watching a dry, educational film. Not my cup of tea.

Dennis Grubbs Jul 16, 2008 12:54




Crawled [11/30] - We promised all users participating in the Sticker Mania Promo ...



ABOUT | FAQ | PRESS RELEASES | HELP | CONTACT
USAGE POLICY | PRIVACY POLICY

Copyright 2008 Qassia. All Rights Reserved.

Username:
Password:
No account? Sign up.
Lost password? Retrieve.